AA Exposes Bush's 'Big Lie': Flight 11 DID NOT FLY on 911!

Reprinting from What's All This, Then?, due to its significance.

Wow! Double Wow! Finally! The following excerpt is from an excellent article by Len Hart that I just found at his The Existentialist Cowboy blog.

Now just look at this picture... for a bit... let it sink in... that my friends is a Global Hawk, an unmanned self-flying death machine courtesy of the powers that be... painted to look like an AA airliner. Is this the very Global Hawk that left its little engine's rotor on the Pentagon lawn? That's really creepy. And that makes me wonder... do these technicians realize just exactly what it is that they are really doing? My God...

This image alone should get you to read the complete article. Seriously.

I am a strong supporter of the work that Craig Ranke and his Citizen Investigation Team (CIT) have done regarding events at the Pentagon. They've incontrovertibly shown that an airliner simply could not have hit the Pentagon and that the damage to the building concurs with that fact. They've also proven that the 'downed' light poles and the ludicrous taxi incident were staged. Ranke feels that explosives in the building caused the damage and that no aircraft of any kind struck.

That creepy photo above, though, coupled with what little evidence we have from the scene, along with Rumsfeld stating that a missile hit the building, has got my brain turned all kinds of ways... as it may very well mean that the above pictured missile actually did strike the Pentagon, for although the required maneuvers are quite impossible for an airliner to achieve, those same acrobatics were not so at all for this platform.

Hence it is within the realm of plausibility that the decoy plane seen up close and personal by the eyewitnesses interviewed by CIT, which flew away behind the fireball, was timed to coincide with the arrival of this device... and not to internally planted explosives. Also keep in mind that none, yes, none, of the people heard from in the news coverage on that day were "regular guys," but instead all employees of the media giants.

Well, I've gotten carried away a bit by being riveted to that image. I apologize. I don't want to take away from the article's main story, which, obviously is the fact that American Airlines itself has finally told the truth and owned up to the fact that those flights so critical to the official story never happened. Thank you AA for living up to your name. That's huge. And without those planes being in the air, the entire government line falls to dust, just like the thousands of innocent people they killed in carrying out their sick "new Pearl Harbor." Like it says in the sidebar, no planes crashed anywhere on September 11th, 2001. Period. Deal with it.

I like this Len Hart. He thinks like me and our attitudes seen similar in more than one area. Also covered in the article are many of the other aspects of 9/11 including the revelation by United Airlines on the day that it had landed, the towers, mainstream medias apparent difficulty in keeping to the timeline of their scripts, and what we'd all like to see happen. There are a bunch of good comments and there's a nice list of resources to cap it off.

Ready? Here you go...

THURSDAY, JULY 02, 2009

AA Exposes Bush's 'Big Lie': Flight 11 DID NOT FLY on 911!

by Len Hart, The Existentialist Cowboy

American Airlines itself is the source for information that AA Flights 11 (North Tower) and 77 (Pentagon) did not fly on 911. These flights are critical to the the government's crumbling cover up! Without those flights, Bush and his murderous co-conspirators will have to revise the big lie. They will have to concoct yet another cover story from the ground up! A cover up is on the brink of collapse when those guilty of capital crimes and high treason either turn on one another or are forced to revise the lie!If neither flight was in the air as American Airlines itself has so stated, then numerous 'official versions' of the 'official conspiracy theory' are all a pack of malicious lies. That includes almost every statement made by Bush. It is, in my opinion, probable cause to indict Bush and his co-conspirators for the crimes of mass murder and high treason.

WikiScanner discovered that American Airlines changed their Wikipedia entry to state that Flights 11 and 77 did not fly on 9/11. The original entry was as follows:

Two American Airlines aircraft were hijacked and crashed during the September 11, 2001 Terrorist Attack: American Airlines Flight 77 (a Boeing 757) and American Airlines Flight 11 (a Boeing 767).

New entry is as follows and includes the bolded text below:

Two American Airlines aircraft were hijacked and crashed during the September 11, 2001 Terrorist Attack: Flight 77 (a Boeing 757) and Flight 11 (a Boeing 767).

Although these flights were daily departures before and a month after September 11, 2001. Neither flight 11 nor 77 were scheduled on September 11, 2001. The records kept by the Bureau of Transportation Statistics (www.bts.gov/gis/) do not list either flight that day. --Wikipedia

To make the point: the source for these change is American Airlines by making changes to Wikipedia. The 'story' is not Wiki. The story is not about Wiki. The story is about how AA 'corrected' a wiki entry. The story is about the fact that the evidence that Flights 11 and 77 were not flying on 911 comes from American Airlines itself.

According to a Freedom of Information Act reply from the U.S. Bureau of Transportation Statistics (BTS), the last known pre-9/11 flights for three of the four aircraft involved in the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001 took place in December, 2000, nine months before the attacks, while no pre-9/11 final flight information was provided for American Airlines flight 77 (N644AA).

However, a searchable online BTS database produces the following search results for three of the four 9/11 aircraft on September 10, 2001:

AA 11 departs San Francisco (SFO): AA 09/10/2001 0198 (flight number) N334AA (tail number) BOS (destination) 22:04 (wheels-off time)

UA 175 departs San Francisco (SFO): UA 09/10/2001 0170 (flight number) N612UA (tail number) BOS (destination) 13:44 (wheels-off time)

UA 93 departs San Francisco (SFO): UA 09/10/2001 0078 (flight number) N591UA (tail number) EWR (destination) 23:15 (wheels-off time)--911 Blogger, UPDATE: U.S. BTS FOIA Records For 9/11 Planes Differ From BTS Online Database [The records were obtained by Adrian Monaghan]

Anyone trying to prove that Flights 77 and 11 were not flying on 911 would have to verify that proposition through authoritative sources that could confirm it. The question is raised: how do we know who made the changes to Wiki? Everyone logged on to the internet does so from an IP address. In this case, the IP is that of American Airlines. It's traceable.

My own WHOIS lookup as well as a Google search of the IP address proves conclusively that it was --indeed --American Airlines itself that made the change. It is American Airlines --by way of Wiki --that has said that neither Flight 11 nor Flight 77 were in the air that day.

Therefore, the Bush theory of 911 is a deliberate lie. My look up returned the following: [...]

Continue reading the article, as it gets ever so much deeper. Ever so much.

We must insist, and I mean insist, on bringing these heinous, treasonous, murdering thugs to justice. What they did not only ruined America, but ruined the whole damn world. I personally feel that Obama is just another Bush, working to further the criminal aims set forth before him... and so far his actions would seem to indicate just that. Maybe this will prompt him into foregoing his handler's orders and boldly taking actions that We The People will be truly proud of.

Russian Navy UFO records say aliens love oceans

Image courtesy UFO Chronicles 9-24-07

This just in from Mother Russia...

Well, Jeez, comrades, we knew that, or most of us anyway. Even good old Christopher Columbus reported seeing some dandy UFOs/USOs in waters down south. I even saw a pretty sporty one in the Gulf of Texaco, nearly two years ago now. Mine didn't go under, though, it just skimmed the surface.

But it is certainly a very nice development, this declassifying bit on the part of the Russian authority. The more the merrier, you know? This bandwagon certainly seems to be getting more and more popular and we the curious welcome it. If nothing else, and I'm predisposed to nothing else, it'll give us a ton of new reports to read and ponder, seeing if we can fit it all nicely into all the other reports we have.

There are all sorts of theories as to why these objects like to be near or in water. From fuel to cooling to nourishment, your guess is as good as mine. Ed Walters of Florida even snapped a picture that shows a water spout connecting the ocean surface and the hovering saucer. There have been thousands of reports... the most famous being the spectacular events in Shag Harbour in Canada, replete with Navy reconnaissance and full documentation.

It's all rather spectacular, actually, isn't it? Sets the mind to wondering... just what is going on?!

Presented below, the report from Russia Today...

Russian Navy UFO records say aliens love oceans
21 July, 2009, 18:56

The Russian navy has declassified its records of encounters with unidentified objects technologically surpassing anything humanity ever built, reports Svobodnaya Pressa news website.

The records dating back to soviet times were compiled by a special navy group collecting reports of unexplained incidents delivered by submarines and military ships. The group was headed by deputy Navy commander Admiral Nikolay Smirnov, and the documents reveal numerous cases of possible UFO encounters, the website says.

Vladimir Azhazha, former navy officer and a famous Russian UFO researcher, says the materials are of great value.

“Fifty percent of UFO encounters are connected with oceans. Fifteen more – with lakes. So UFOs tend to stick to the water,” he said.

On one occasion a nuclear submarine, which was on a combat mission in the Pacific Ocean, detected six unknown objects. After the crew failed to leave behind their pursuers by maneuvering, the captain ordered to surface. The objects followed suit, took to the air, and flew away.

Many mysterious events happened in the region of Bermuda Triangle, recalls retired submarine commander Rear Admiral Yury Beketov. Instruments malfunctioned with no apparent reason or detected strong interference. The former navy officer says this could be deliberate disruption by UFOs.

“On several occasions the instruments gave reading of material objects moving at incredible speed. Calculations showed speeds of about 230 knots, of 400 kph. Speeding so fast is a challenge even on the surface. But water resistance is much higher. It was like the objects defied the laws of physics. There’s only one explanation: the creatures who built them far surpass us in development,” Beketov said.

Navy intelligence veteran, Captain 1st rank Igor Barklay comments:

“Ocean UFOs often show up wherever our or NATO’s fleets concentrate. Near Bahamas, Bermudas, Puerto Rico. They are most often seen in the deepest part of the Atlantic Ocean, in the southern part of the Bermuda Triangle, and also in the Caribbean Sea.”

Another place where people often report UFO encounters is Russia’s Lake Baikal, the deepest fresh water body in the world. Fishermen tell of powerful lights coming from the deep and objects flying up from the water.

In one case in 1982 a group of military divers training at Baikal spotted a group of humanoid creatures dressed in silvery suits. The encounter happened at a depth of 50 meters, and the divers tried to catch the strangers. Three of the seven men died, while four others were severely injured.

“I think about underwater bases and say: why not? Nothing should be discarded,” says Vladimir Azhazha. “Skepticism is the easiest way: believe nothing, do nothing. People rarely visit great depths. So it’s very important to analyze what they encounter there.”

Read also UFO phenomenon was strictly tabooed in USSR

Keep looking, you'll find it...

40 Years On, It's Time To Go Back.

Forty years ago today, men walked on another celestial body. Let's go back there.

As a child I watched in awe at the proceedings, the spectacle, riveted to the TV. It was marvelous. It was more, it was fantabulous. It caused serious, deep pride and excitement and a desire to learn. And it continued again and again and again until one day... it stopped.

It was perhaps an omen, that halt, as ever since then, the world has accelerated into decline. Maybe if we start up again, the world will turn around. Rose-colored glasses? Sure. But exploration and the continual sating of that ingrained human lust for knowledge can only lead to good things.

I want us to go back there.

Publicly. Properly. With no obfuscation.

There's so much to discover. So much.

So much to... dig up... and learn from.

Not to mention the resources.

We have the tech.

We must abandon the global course of chaos we're on and redirect those war funds and exploitative purposes to activities that will reap rewards for all.

Mr. Obama, do you have the balls?

Come on... let's go.









[from What's All This, Then?]

Gerald Celente on Obamageddon via Alex Jones

Knowledgeable expert and forecaster of the imminent, true Patriot Gerald Celente shared some thoughts with Alex Jones earlier in 2009. Visit trend forecaster, author, and founder and director of The Trends Research Institute, Gerald Celente at www.trendsresearch.com and Alex Jones at www.infowars.com, too!

Part 1



Part 2



Part 3



Part 4

Psychic Severely Beaten In Greenwich, Connecticut

My hometown has just gotten a little less nice...

The following was just posted at the Phantoms & Monsters blog. Not good. Looks like the sick stupidity of the "cracker" mentality knows no geographic boundaries... threatening a kid is heinous, disgusting and intolerable, these bottom-feeding bastards need to locked up... go, cops, go!

- - - - - - - -

Connecticut Psychic Threatened, Severely Beaten

Posted: 17 Jul 2009 05:04 AM PDT

After receiving threatening phone calls and being injured by a man during a midnight attack in Greenwich over the weekend, a local psychic says someone is trying to drive her out of business.

Janet Lee said she was taken to the hospital after being beaten by a man outside her office at 16 Greenwich Ave., in Greenwich, late Friday night. She also has an office at 565 Westport Ave., in Norwalk.

Four days before the attack, which left her with a black eye and a cut on her face, Lee reported to Norwalk police that a woman left several threatening phone messages focusing on her business and her son.

Norwalk and Greenwich police said they are investigating Lee's complaints.

In one of the messages the woman said, "This town is not big enough for the two of us. We want you to take down your sign," said Lee, who lives in Norwalk.

In another call, the woman described her son, the car he was driving and even the fact that he was going to a summer program at his Westport school, said Lee, who would not give her age.

"They never said they were going to hurt me, they kept saying, get out of town or else," Lee said. "It is difficult for me to comment on what is going on. I do not know what is going on."

Lee said she walked out of her Greenwich office at about midnight Friday when a man attacked her with his fists. The man told her that he was going to kill her, she said.

Greenwich police Lt. Daniel Allen would not confirm Lee's name, but said police were called to Greenwich Hospital at 1:13 a.m. Saturday to interview a woman who said she was attacked outside of 16 Greenwich Ave.

"I can't give any further information. It is still under investigation," Allen said.

Norwalk police Sgt. Andre Velez said police are investigating Lee's complaint of harassing phone calls and are aware of the Greenwich investigation. He would not discuss the case further.

Lee said she has been a psychic in Norwalk for eight years and told people's futures in Greenwich for 10. Until 2004, she even had a two-year stint as a "promotional" psychic at Saks Fifth Avenue in Greenwich.

Lee, who says she has a large clientele and describes herself as a "life coach," said it is not unusual for her to receive crank calls. But these calls were different, she said.

Late last week, Lee said someone was tampering with the sign at her Norwalk office.

Lee said she has heard that another psychic is coming into the area, but has no idea who it is.

Her psychic gifts are no help to her in this investigation, Lee said.

"I am not able to read for myself or my children. I can only see things for other people," Lee said.

********************

Hemp Seed Oil: Nature’s Richest Essential Fatty Acid Source

Hemp is truly a wonder plant. The kind they dream of finding deep in the rainforests. Well, it's not quite so exotic, but its myriad uses are simply impressive.

Certified Organic Hemp Seed Oil

Manitoba Harvest™ Hemp Seed Oil is nature’s richest source of the Essential Fatty Acids (76%) and is a rich source of GLA (3%). Hemp Seed Oil offers a good balance of Omega 6 to Omega 3 fatty acids (3.75 to 1), suitable for life long consumption.

Manitoba Harvest™ Hemp Seed Oil has a light green color and has a mild nutty flavor, a tasteful compliment to a variety of foods. It can be added to juices, smoothies, soups and sauces to create a rich creamy texture. Hemp Seed Oil is an excellent base for any salad dressing. You can substitute Hemp Seed Oil for other oils in recipes that are not heated above 160 C (320 F).

Stock up today.

White House Drafting Executive Order to Allow Indefinite Detention; Move Would Bypass Congress

Seems our Mr. Obama, or whatever his name really is, is hell bent on escalating the horrors that the Bush years introduced to us all. What a good little neoZionical putz of a slaveboy he is. He makes my skin crawl. This just in...

- - - - - - - - -

White House Drafting Executive Order to Allow Indefinite Detention; Move Would Bypass Congress
By Dafna Linzer, Peter Finn, ProPublica

Such an order embraces claims by George W. Bush that certain people can be held without trial for long periods under the laws of war. Read more »

In May, President Obama made a speech in which he announced that he was considering preventive detention as a way to handle "detainees at Guantanamo who cannot be prosecuted yet who pose a clear danger to the American people." Obama never uttered the phrase "preventive detention." But that's what he was getting at -- while adding that "we must have clear, defensible, and lawful standards for those who fall into this category."

This week, ProPublica co-published a report revealing that the preventive detention plan might actually be issued via executive order, bypassing Congress. The news was chilling. As New York Times columnist Bob Herbert wrote this week, "Americans should recoil as one against the idea of preventive detention, imprisoning people indefinitely, for years and perhaps for life, without charge and without giving them an opportunity to demonstrate their innocence."

And yet we've embraced it, asserting that there are people who are far too dangerous to even think about releasing but who cannot be put on trial because we have no real evidence that they have committed any crime, or because we've tortured them and therefore the evidence would not be admissible ... President Obama is O.K. with this (he calls it "prolonged detention"), but he wants to make sure it is carried out -- here comes the oxymoron -- fairly and nonabusively.

In a news week dominated by right-wing sex scandals, celebrity deaths, a 150-year Madoff sentence and a Latin American military coup, Obama's preventive detention scheme was largely overlooked. It cannot be ignored going forward.

Thanks for reading,

Liliana Segura,
Editor,
Rights & Liberties Special Coverage